Horizontal in load development

the big greasy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
89
Location
grease county
So 308 175mk 41-42 grs of imr 4064, coal 2.800. At 500 yards the vertical is 1-1/4 inch spread, that's the best node, but my horizontal is 3-4 inches. So I'm still doing load development, but I'm wondering will shortening coal help horizontal dispersion? I can't go longer due to mag length. Also what's a good increment to decrease at a time?
 
Wind would be my first guess. I would either retest on a calm day or shoot groups at 100 yards. Your seating depth can be adjusted to change your group size and shape. Contrary to popular belief, seating bullets both closer and further from the lands can both negatively or positively affect your group sizes. I would suggest working forward in .005 increments until you reach your lands or your magazine restricts you or until you find a good load. If you don't get better results, then work back from 2.800" and see if that improves things. Be careful and don't seat the bullets too deep into the cases.
 
Wind would be my first guess. I would either retest on a calm day or shoot groups at 100 yards. Your seating depth can be adjusted to change your group size and shape. Contrary to popular belief, seating bullets both closer and further from the lands can both negatively or positively affect your group sizes. I would suggest working forward in .005 increments until you reach your lands or your magazine restricts you or until you find a good load. If you don't get better results, then work back from 2.800" and see if that improves things. Be careful and don't seat the bullets too deep into the cases.

The longest I can go is 2.800, because I do want to use the box mag, what increments should I work backwards?

I will admit there was a slight wind, although I didn't think it was a factor because it was light, maybe not lol
 
The best you can do is Berger's recommended full seating testing.
Be sure to back away from your current load so that you can see results of seating instead of simple loss of powder node.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top