Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hexagonal Boron Nitride
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="royinidaho" data-source="post: 1256686" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Steve,</p><p></p><p>I'm a bit lazy and not too finicky about some things. My experience with each caliber and weight of your Hammer Hunters I've shot I haven't "cleaned" any of them.</p><p></p><p>I have no idea of what you do post removal from the "machine" but when I get them they coat fine (using my empirically developed method).</p><p></p><p>All of the positive and expected changes in performance has been realized. ES = Ziltch. Copper fouling = Ziltch. First clean cold bore shot in the group. Plus I clean so infrequently that I don't worry about that first cold clean bore shot.</p><p></p><p>The only anomaly I've experienced is that with my best load in the 375 Allen Mag which is the 395 HH ahead of RL-50 the anticipated velocity drop occurs. The down side is I can't add enough RL-50 to make up the difference.</p><p></p><p>With the 395 HH starting out at 3125 +/- 2 FPS seems to have enough umpf to get done what needs to be done. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>FYI, when I was cleaning very close dimension tolerance standards which required absolutely no film from the cleaning process (as any film whatever jammed things up) Dial Soap was the only "safe" effective cleaning solution permitted by the manufacturer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="royinidaho, post: 1256686, member: 2011"] Steve, I'm a bit lazy and not too finicky about some things. My experience with each caliber and weight of your Hammer Hunters I've shot I haven't "cleaned" any of them. I have no idea of what you do post removal from the "machine" but when I get them they coat fine (using my empirically developed method). All of the positive and expected changes in performance has been realized. ES = Ziltch. Copper fouling = Ziltch. First clean cold bore shot in the group. Plus I clean so infrequently that I don't worry about that first cold clean bore shot. The only anomaly I've experienced is that with my best load in the 375 Allen Mag which is the 395 HH ahead of RL-50 the anticipated velocity drop occurs. The down side is I can't add enough RL-50 to make up the difference. With the 395 HH starting out at 3125 +/- 2 FPS seems to have enough umpf to get done what needs to be done. :cool: FYI, when I was cleaning very close dimension tolerance standards which required absolutely no film from the cleaning process (as any film whatever jammed things up) Dial Soap was the only "safe" effective cleaning solution permitted by the manufacturer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hexagonal Boron Nitride
Top