Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
hello there
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Senderofan" data-source="post: 1100594" data-attributes="member: 13831"><p>No...Neither. I'm a consumer....I have a very vested interest in securing high value for my dollar. And for the money...I happen to think Vortex has very viable options for consumers.</p><p></p><p>You still have not said which "Best" scope from Vortex you thought was terribly inferior. Was it a CrossFire?, Diamond Back?, Viper? Viper -HS ( T)?, Viper-PST?, Razor Gen 1 or Gen 2? The issue I have is blanket statements....."I would never purchase a scope from manufacturer X...because I looked through one or two and felt they are inferior." I think it would be more helpful to provide more details such as: Were the turrets off? Were you not able to adjust the parallax properly? Was there a huge amount of CA? Was there tunneling? Was the eye box unforgiving. Were you unable to get the scope focused to your satisfaction. These are the things that are more helpful to people.....rather than just saying "I was not impressed."</p><p></p><p>I have scopes from Refield, Nikon , Sightron, IOR and Premier Heritage. I have also enjoyed scopes from Kahles, NightForce, Burris and Leupold. I try and select a scope for its merits, my budget at that time and the rifles particular job.......not out of brand loyalty.</p><p></p><p>So in the quest for sharing as accurate of information as we can on this forum.....I disagreed with your blanket statement. There was no intent to make it personal....just for you to provide more detail on your statement. Just so this doesn't turn into a Ford versus Chevy and Dodge scenario......which never really helps anyone out. I happen to enjoy reading detailed pro's and con's on scopes....it really helps me when it comes time to make a purchase. I live in a rural area and most of the time have to make my purchases based on what I've read on multiple forums....we don't have retail stores with multitudes of different scopes to compare.</p><p></p><p>Wayne</p><p></p><p>I would venture a guess that if you compared a Razor Gen2 4.5-27x with your 6500......with both scopes adjusted properly.....you would not call the Razor inferior to your Bushnell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Senderofan, post: 1100594, member: 13831"] No...Neither. I'm a consumer....I have a very vested interest in securing high value for my dollar. And for the money...I happen to think Vortex has very viable options for consumers. You still have not said which "Best" scope from Vortex you thought was terribly inferior. Was it a CrossFire?, Diamond Back?, Viper? Viper -HS ( T)?, Viper-PST?, Razor Gen 1 or Gen 2? The issue I have is blanket statements....."I would never purchase a scope from manufacturer X...because I looked through one or two and felt they are inferior." I think it would be more helpful to provide more details such as: Were the turrets off? Were you not able to adjust the parallax properly? Was there a huge amount of CA? Was there tunneling? Was the eye box unforgiving. Were you unable to get the scope focused to your satisfaction. These are the things that are more helpful to people.....rather than just saying "I was not impressed." I have scopes from Refield, Nikon , Sightron, IOR and Premier Heritage. I have also enjoyed scopes from Kahles, NightForce, Burris and Leupold. I try and select a scope for its merits, my budget at that time and the rifles particular job.......not out of brand loyalty. So in the quest for sharing as accurate of information as we can on this forum.....I disagreed with your blanket statement. There was no intent to make it personal....just for you to provide more detail on your statement. Just so this doesn't turn into a Ford versus Chevy and Dodge scenario......which never really helps anyone out. I happen to enjoy reading detailed pro's and con's on scopes....it really helps me when it comes time to make a purchase. I live in a rural area and most of the time have to make my purchases based on what I've read on multiple forums....we don't have retail stores with multitudes of different scopes to compare. Wayne I would venture a guess that if you compared a Razor Gen2 4.5-27x with your 6500......with both scopes adjusted properly.....you would not call the Razor inferior to your Bushnell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
hello there
Top