luizinga
New Member
Can any body give me an opinion of this Foster Co-Ax press! I am planning on buying this press under the assumption that is like a Bentley of presses!
There a couple things the O frame or C frame actually does easier than the Co-Ax. I've always felt pulling bullets was easier. I do some serious case form, that involves cutting cases back considerable amounts. Much easier with the others types. Yet case forming is much easier and better the Co-Ax. Also the press is limited to about 3.62" over all length for seating bullets. (I have done a little longer, but it's a pain). I've loaded 45acp, and that's as short as I like to do on any press. I find it just as bad on the RCBS setting next it.
gary
Is there any reason to keep my Rock Chucker if I Buy a forester? I too have been thinking about one
I have the CO-AX, RockChucker and a Lock n Load single stage. I like them in that particular order. The CO-AX is definitely has the best on board priming system, and I personally like the shell holder system. If all I had was the Rock Chucker, I wouldn't feel handicapped. The Lock n load on the otherhand, I feel I could crush with the Rock Chucker. They both look the same, but the Rock Chucker is much more robust.... I use my CO-AX for all of my standard and magnum case head cartridges, and the Rock Chucker for my .223 and some pistol. The Lock n load is just for priming .223 and pocket swaging...