Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Eld x vs berger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5RWill" data-source="post: 1394950" data-attributes="member: 98561"><p>There's a debate that sparked interest on the MPRC/MLRS facebook page about terminal ballistics and expansion. Lots of advocates for through and through shots with the accubond and it does seem to work extremely well. Lots that would prefer the round dumping all it's energy. Much like the ELD M. Some think proper wound channel and hemorrhage is the answer. Others believe hydrostatic shock to the right place (CNS) is the answer. I'm not a physicist, even though i do enjoy kinematics, and am certainly no ballistician. The only certain guarantee that we have that said animal is DRT to severe or incapacitate the CNS, simple as that.</p><p></p><p>I've only ever seen one negative review on the ELD-X, which albeit was concerning. It was on the hide for a guy who went elk hunting, can't remember what caliber or cartridge. But it basically went under the skin and blew up behind the front shoulder. Seriously looked like a grenade had went off or something. Looking on google but can't seem to find it. Most results with the ELD-X are pretty popular.</p><p></p><p>I switched to ELDs across the board for our hunting rifles mainly on the premise i can get them for 31$ or so per 100ct so nearly 20$ cheaper than Elite Hunters or the 123gr Scenar i was shooting. I'd honestly buy all three of the aforementioned or two at least and see which shoots better and run with it. Lots of hunters have had great success with all three. Though i'll say i hear and have had less consistent results with Bergers for traditional shots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5RWill, post: 1394950, member: 98561"] There's a debate that sparked interest on the MPRC/MLRS facebook page about terminal ballistics and expansion. Lots of advocates for through and through shots with the accubond and it does seem to work extremely well. Lots that would prefer the round dumping all it's energy. Much like the ELD M. Some think proper wound channel and hemorrhage is the answer. Others believe hydrostatic shock to the right place (CNS) is the answer. I'm not a physicist, even though i do enjoy kinematics, and am certainly no ballistician. The only certain guarantee that we have that said animal is DRT to severe or incapacitate the CNS, simple as that. I've only ever seen one negative review on the ELD-X, which albeit was concerning. It was on the hide for a guy who went elk hunting, can't remember what caliber or cartridge. But it basically went under the skin and blew up behind the front shoulder. Seriously looked like a grenade had went off or something. Looking on google but can't seem to find it. Most results with the ELD-X are pretty popular. I switched to ELDs across the board for our hunting rifles mainly on the premise i can get them for 31$ or so per 100ct so nearly 20$ cheaper than Elite Hunters or the 123gr Scenar i was shooting. I'd honestly buy all three of the aforementioned or two at least and see which shoots better and run with it. Lots of hunters have had great success with all three. Though i'll say i hear and have had less consistent results with Bergers for traditional shots. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Eld x vs berger
Top