Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Consensus on barrel contour?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MagnumManiac" data-source="post: 2070096" data-attributes="member: 10755"><p>Hi all,</p><p>Have a question regarding contours for F-class barrels. </p><p>I run the 1.250" barrels on my heavy guns, but recently tried .950" just for craps & giggles. </p><p>They shot just as well, so my question is; if weight wasn't the only reason for using such heavy barrels, is there another reason for not using them?</p><p>Also, I'm in the market for a new McMillan F-class stock with a narrower fore end cut out, anyone know who the Australian distributor is? Can't find it and I don't want to wait 9 months.</p><p></p><p>Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MagnumManiac, post: 2070096, member: 10755"] Hi all, Have a question regarding contours for F-class barrels. I run the 1.250” barrels on my heavy guns, but recently tried .950” just for craps & giggles. They shot just as well, so my question is; if weight wasn’t the only reason for using such heavy barrels, is there another reason for not using them? Also, I’m in the market for a new McMillan F-class stock with a narrower fore end cut out, anyone know who the Australian distributor is? Can’t find it and I don’t want to wait 9 months. Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Consensus on barrel contour?
Top