Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Can you all stand yet another VS WWTB optics thread?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DartonJager" data-source="post: 2046895" data-attributes="member: 95733"><p>I'd have to say I fall short of deserving the term "fawning" as I Openly admit both my Bushnell 4200's (I own 4) and my WGS's (I own 4 also) all have been subjected to the same recoil abuse and hard use as my Leupolds and have held up perfectly and bolth the 4200 and WGS track more accurately and consistently than my Leupolds VariX-II's and VariX-III's and the glass IMHO is better and the diopter is easier to set on the 4200 and WGS</p><p>The ONLY reason I'm not considering Bushnell or Weaver is they currently do not offer a scope that meets my criteria(s)</p><p>I am leaning more towards the Leupold primarily because it has a locking elevation dial and the way I hunt I am about 90% certain I will make contact with the dials often enough that a locking dial is a feature worthy of consideration but if the fact is the V4 tracts better than I would choose it as tracking is more important than anything else in a Tactical style scope if all other qualities are equal within a reasonable margin</p><p></p><p>But you have raised a extremely important question concerning reticle types and I thank you for it. You have caused me to pause and rethink my choices. I will post a request for input to educate myself better on reticlec types and what have the experienced amoung us found what reticle design works all around the best for hunting</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DartonJager, post: 2046895, member: 95733"] I'd have to say I fall short of deserving the term "fawning" as I Openly admit both my Bushnell 4200's (I own 4) and my WGS's (I own 4 also) all have been subjected to the same recoil abuse and hard use as my Leupolds and have held up perfectly and bolth the 4200 and WGS track more accurately and consistently than my Leupolds VariX-II's and VariX-III's and the glass IMHO is better and the diopter is easier to set on the 4200 and WGS The ONLY reason I'm not considering Bushnell or Weaver is they currently do not offer a scope that meets my criteria(s) I am leaning more towards the Leupold primarily because it has a locking elevation dial and the way I hunt I am about 90% certain I will make contact with the dials often enough that a locking dial is a feature worthy of consideration but if the fact is the V4 tracts better than I would choose it as tracking is more important than anything else in a Tactical style scope if all other qualities are equal within a reasonable margin But you have raised a extremely important question concerning reticle types and I thank you for it. You have caused me to pause and rethink my choices. I will post a request for input to educate myself better on reticlec types and what have the experienced amoung us found what reticle design works all around the best for hunting [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Can you all stand yet another VS WWTB optics thread?
Top