Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
CA Ridgeline vs Tikka T3x
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dougduey" data-source="post: 2308489" data-attributes="member: 33159"><p>I own a Sako and a Tikka. Both are tack drivers. The big issue with Tikka's is limited mag length which really hampers the 300 WM and 7 Rem Mag, especially if you reload. A muzzle brake and a better stock will also help make it better. </p><p>Action screws need to be torqued to exactly 35 lbs…….this holds true in the factory stock only. Also, shoots using sand bags and don't use a bipod. Front loading of the bipod creates forend rib pressures and causes recoil issues. Again, this is with the factory stock.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dougduey, post: 2308489, member: 33159"] I own a Sako and a Tikka. Both are tack drivers. The big issue with Tikka’s is limited mag length which really hampers the 300 WM and 7 Rem Mag, especially if you reload. A muzzle brake and a better stock will also help make it better. Action screws need to be torqued to exactly 35 lbs…….this holds true in the factory stock only. Also, shoots using sand bags and don’t use a bipod. Front loading of the bipod creates forend rib pressures and causes recoil issues. Again, this is with the factory stock. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
CA Ridgeline vs Tikka T3x
Top