Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Buyers beware
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="P7M13" data-source="post: 2250308" data-attributes="member: 94154"><p>I'll be a phallus here - I don't see the problem that causes all this hubub.</p><p>Pictures on the ad seemed sufficient.</p><p>If gun functions and performs flawlessly, seems to me the seller was A-OK in his description.</p><p>Aesthetics are subjective. I know people who think the AMC Pacer and Pontiac Aztek are good looking cars. The barrel channel is obviously made for a sporter with longer shank, not an ultralight profile. May not look right to you, but I have rifles that look like that.</p><p>Function first, form second. Edit to add -- it's not the seller's responsibility to disclose stuff that pertains to aesthetics. Scratches in a stock are material defects -- a barrel channel mismatch is not.</p><p>I think the post and slam were unnecessary, because it's down to that subjective thing, aesthetics. The seller did not mislead, and so I would expect he didn't feel it was necessary to refund. </p><p>It's kind of like a dialogue my wife and I have about family pictures on the wall. There's one that keeps tilting, no matter what we do. Drives her nuts, I think it adds character and levity to the photo of a wonderful day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="P7M13, post: 2250308, member: 94154"] I'll be a phallus here - I don't see the problem that causes all this hubub. Pictures on the ad seemed sufficient. If gun functions and performs flawlessly, seems to me the seller was A-OK in his description. Aesthetics are subjective. I know people who think the AMC Pacer and Pontiac Aztek are good looking cars. The barrel channel is obviously made for a sporter with longer shank, not an ultralight profile. May not look right to you, but I have rifles that look like that. Function first, form second. Edit to add -- it's not the seller's responsibility to disclose stuff that pertains to aesthetics. Scratches in a stock are material defects -- a barrel channel mismatch is not. I think the post and slam were unnecessary, because it's down to that subjective thing, aesthetics. The seller did not mislead, and so I would expect he didn't feel it was necessary to refund. It's kind of like a dialogue my wife and I have about family pictures on the wall. There's one that keeps tilting, no matter what we do. Drives her nuts, I think it adds character and levity to the photo of a wonderful day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Buyers beware
Top