bushnell 6500 or zeiss conquest

Greywolf18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
361
Location
New Bern, NC
I am building a 6.5-280AI rifle and trying to decide which optics to put on the rifle. I have other zeiss conquests and absolutely love them, and I also have a bushnell 3200 and 4200 tactical. The glass is far better on the zeiss, but I don't know if the 6500 is better than the other ones. I was looking and the busnell 2.5-16 or the zeiss conquest 3.5-10x44, 4.5-14x44, and the 4.5-14x50 with the turrets. Since most of the shots will be within 100-200 yards, but maybe out to 500 I'm not sure if I want the turrets or not. Which would you guys pick out of these scopes? I can't really afford more expensive models like a NF or USO and so these are on the top end of my budget. I think once I finish this project I'll start saving for and EDGE with a NF, but for now this will have to do! Thanks for the help guysgun)
 

winmagman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
1,379
Location
Southern Wisconsin
Of the two you've listed I'd go with the Conquest, nothing against the 6500, just think the Zeiss has better glass.

If you're interested in other options take a look at the Clearidge Ultra XP5 at the Optics Zone. Glass isn't quite as good as the Zeiss but it'll run with the Bushnell for less $$$.

Chris
 

Greywolf18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
361
Location
New Bern, NC
My longest range will prolly be 500 yds, do you think getting the turrets on the scope is worth it? Most shots will be 100-200 yds
 

winmagman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
1,379
Location
Southern Wisconsin
I generally find that out to 250 yds I don't use the turrets, 300yds and beyond I always dial up.

My personal preference is to get turrets, can't use them even ocassionally if you don't have them. But thats me.

Chris
 

HUAINAMACHERO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
1,080
Greywolf18,
That depends on how much do you want to take that occasional 500 yard shot. If most of your shots will be between 100 and 200 yards, maybe the turrets are not worthy, but if you really desire to take that 500 yard shot, then it is more than likely a must have type of thing. Good luck anyways, and happy new year.
 

mtelkhntr78

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
183
I would opt for the Zeiss. I ordered another one yesterday making that my third conquest. Outstanding glass IMHO.
Just my $.02
 

winelines

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
49
Location
Annapolis, MD
I really like my Conquests; I have two - a 3.5-10 with the Rapid Z reticle and a 6.5-20 with the mil dot Reticle. I really like the Rapid Z for hunting out to 500 yds. In shorter range hunting situations, the Rapid Z is much faster.
 

Trending threads

Recent Posts

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top