Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Coyote Hunting - From 10 Yards to over 1,000 Yards
AR-15 vs. Ruger Ranch Rifle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goofycat" data-source="post: 332052" data-attributes="member: 6504"><p>Looks like the AR is the one. I know that there are many, many companies that sell ARs that are reportedly accurized, but which company would you suggest that I start with....one that is honest, reliable and sells a product that will produce at least minute of angle accuracy....or as close to it as I can get with one of my bench rest rifles. One minute of angle would be just fine. I know that Ruger just came out with an AR format, but $2,000 is too steep.</p><p></p><p>Also, which .20 caliber would be suitable (i.e., the .204 Ruger, .20 Tactical, etc.), and why do you feel that a .20 would produce better results than a .223....(or would it?). Remember that I don't need to save pelts. I know I would have to hand load for any of the .20 caliber fodder (perhaps with the exception of the .204 Ruger), so would the .223 be a better bet from the reloading standpoint? And, if I decided to reload, I know that Lapua manufacturers fancy-dancy brass for the .204 Tactical. Does this type of expensive brass contribute any greater accuracy in an AR than Win or Remington .223 brass? </p><p></p><p>Another thing: I live in good old liberal California, where it appears that centerfire semi-automatic rifles with pistol grip (such as with the AR) or thumbhole grips (such as with the Ruger Target AR) are now illegal. Anybody know anything about this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goofycat, post: 332052, member: 6504"] Looks like the AR is the one. I know that there are many, many companies that sell ARs that are reportedly accurized, but which company would you suggest that I start with....one that is honest, reliable and sells a product that will produce at least minute of angle accuracy....or as close to it as I can get with one of my bench rest rifles. One minute of angle would be just fine. I know that Ruger just came out with an AR format, but $2,000 is too steep. Also, which .20 caliber would be suitable (i.e., the .204 Ruger, .20 Tactical, etc.), and why do you feel that a .20 would produce better results than a .223....(or would it?). Remember that I don't need to save pelts. I know I would have to hand load for any of the .20 caliber fodder (perhaps with the exception of the .204 Ruger), so would the .223 be a better bet from the reloading standpoint? And, if I decided to reload, I know that Lapua manufacturers fancy-dancy brass for the .204 Tactical. Does this type of expensive brass contribute any greater accuracy in an AR than Win or Remington .223 brass? Another thing: I live in good old liberal California, where it appears that centerfire semi-automatic rifles with pistol grip (such as with the AR) or thumbhole grips (such as with the Ruger Target AR) are now illegal. Anybody know anything about this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Coyote Hunting - From 10 Yards to over 1,000 Yards
AR-15 vs. Ruger Ranch Rifle
Top