Anybody Skelotonized a wood Stock?

20200215_125322.jpg
20200520_053609.jpg

No flex that I can feel, shoots better than Tupperware stock, hasn't broke yet after 3+ years of shooting 7wsm, it is laminate though and not "regular" wood.
Cost me $50 and was a fun project- nowhere near what a cf stock costs. It's not 20 ounces like my ultralight mpi stock i did, but its not 2+ pounds either. Iirc, I reduced the weight over the Tupperware stock by about 4 ounces-- but it's stiffer and shoots better now than it did.
 
Last edited:
I put a light weight inexpensive black plastic on my 338 WM years ago and it has been great. It's been everywhere and I have a shot lot of game with it. Never shifted zero. I did fit a limb saver recoil pad as less weight in the configuration does affect the recoil cycle. The stocks available today are better. Save your original stock. Do your research and decide what you really want in a stock. There are plenty of options for a REM 700.
 
The key is laminate. Regular wood stock with natural grain you are rolling the dice, cut across the wrong section of grain and it may snap like a twig especially if you are aggressive in the wood removal.
I agree, laminate stocks are very similar to plywood. Plywood when compared to the same thickness of solid wood is always stronger.
 
You can bore holes spaced so you can still install a pad , and you also can cut a channel in the fore end , not too wide and not too deep and leave wood in between the channels . stay out of and back away from the pistol grip area . If the foreend flexes you can fill back with glass and re cut . i would not recut the outside shape , unless you are a stock maker and really good with wood shaping . Boring the but stock will be where you gain the most reduction in weight . Carbon fiber would still be lighter. Good luck
 
I hate, more like dislike, it. Pushing it through a table saw, it has a mind of its own, definitely not a wood I would use for stock making
I agree but working with it it's nice and hard doesn't ding up too easily. I agree I definitely would not use it for a stock it's not going to flex at all to help absorb the recoil like other woods and most definitely not like a synthetic
 
The stock on my Weatherby Ultralight Rifle is a Bell and Carlson , made for Weatherby. My guess is that it weighs 20 to 22 ounces . I also would guess that Bell and Carlson makes the same stock, for other actions. Perhaps you can check it out on their Websight???
 
My grandfather, in about 1946, bought my father's first rifle and skeletonized the stock. He also cut the barrel down to less than 16". Both done in the name of weight savings and handling for my dad who was young boy at the time. The rifle is still in the family.
 
Last edited:
Top