• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Any loading data for a 6-300WSM aka 6WSM

IdahoCTD

Official LRH Sponsor
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
1,990
Location
Boise, ID
I was bored and had a reamer from years ago so I built one this weekend. I barely got to shoot it before dark last night to get it on paper at 25yds. I loaded 60 to 64grs of H5010 in 1 grain increments and then loaded 5 at 65 and 5 at 66grs. The first shot was 60grs and it was pretty mild so I jumped right to 65grs. Then I shot a 3 shot group at 25yds with 65grs just because I could barely see the target at 25yds and I knew it would be pointless to try 100yds. It shot in the .1's which was no small feat since I could barely tell where the crosshairs were. It was too dark to get a reading from the chronograph also. Hopefully I'll get another chance tomorrow to see what this load is doing. Any help on loading data would be helpful.
 
I did shoot it this morning Scotty. I shot a 3 shot group with 65grs of H5010 and it was about 5/8" and 3275fps. Then I did a latter test with 60-66grs of Retumbo. 60-63grs (4 shots) went into just over 1/2" and 61-63grs went into 3/8". The velocity was 3274 to 3378 for the 4 shots. 64grs jumped 100fps to 3476 and went an inch or so higher. 65grs went 3482 and 66grs went 3580. So 64grs is probably the max I'd want to shoot but I would lean towards 63grs just for the sake of accuracy. The dilemma is weather or not it is worth keeping. I have 2 .243AI's. One is a rechambered facotry barrel that will shoot 5 shots under 1/2" and the other is a 30" Bartlein that shoots 5 in 1/4". The Bartlein will shoot 105's at 3300fps with 10-15grs less powder. So if I shot where I think the accuracy will be (63grs) the velocity is only around 75fps faster than my .243AI.
 
Got ya Nathan, makes sense to me. Probably at the point of diminished returns with that much capacity. I always though the 6-06 was a screamer and the WSM is that and then some.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top