Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Another "which Hammer" thread. 300WM, Win Mod 70.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="entoptics" data-source="post: 2251480" data-attributes="member: 104268"><p>Thanks for the suggestions all.</p><p></p><p>We decided on the the 2nd/3rd place finisher, the 166 HH. For my buddies purposes, the 166 should offer a flatter close range trajectory and lower recoil, but plenty of killing power for anything he's likely to try to eat.</p><p></p><p>I'm hoping to get 3200 fps out of it (24"), without running it very hard in his 50+ year old rifle.</p><p></p><p>From my understanding, I can just use published load data for conventional bullets as a baseline with the standard Hammer Hunters?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="entoptics, post: 2251480, member: 104268"] Thanks for the suggestions all. We decided on the the 2nd/3rd place finisher, the 166 HH. For my buddies purposes, the 166 should offer a flatter close range trajectory and lower recoil, but plenty of killing power for anything he's likely to try to eat. I'm hoping to get 3200 fps out of it (24"), without running it very hard in his 50+ year old rifle. From my understanding, I can just use published load data for conventional bullets as a baseline with the standard Hammer Hunters? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Another "which Hammer" thread. 300WM, Win Mod 70.
Top