7mm Rem Mag 7977

Thank you.
Do you think going from the 162 to the 180 will have a noticeable difference at distances?
I will have some 162 left over by the time the barrel gets changed out and I thought about trying some but with powder and primers being hard to find I donno if its worth it.
It may have already been brought up but you could surely use your lighter bullets for barrel break in at a reduced load. And not hurt the throat, using faster powders and non magnum rifle primers.
Just a thought
 
The reason for bringing this up is I have ALOT of faster burning powders which we know work better for lighter bullets.
Saving the Sweet stuff for a load after break-in
Especially during these primer/powder pandemic times
 
I use h1000 with 180hybrids, works well.
If ur shooting targets from 1000-1400 yds u should consider the 197smk. That is one consistent wind beating long range bullet
I used it with retumbo in my 8twist 28" tube and the accuracy was at 2920mv
 
Hodgdon's website lists some data for 7977 and the 180s.

Bob
56779A94-4AA4-47B6-AB99-8BD3785AE852.jpeg
 
So I have an update. I finally got a very short window to shoot my OCW with 162 ELDX and 7977. I loaded everything at 0.020 off the lands as this is what my previous barrel liked and I needed a standard for depth. This has been done with brand new brass that as been run though my FL die to get the necks consistent.This is the first time I have shot this gun prior to a few rounds for break in and everything was done at 100yards on the targets shown.
My understanding would be I need to stick with the 69.5 charge as 69.2-69.8 seems to have the same POI and group size. I can mess with setting depth next, according to the books 69.5 of 7977 is max charge but I didn't see any pressure signs or hard bolt lift. What are your thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 20201230_165616.jpg
    20201230_165616.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 107
  • 20201230_165557.jpg
    20201230_165557.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 103
  • 20201230_165605.jpg
    20201230_165605.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 100
Here are my average velocities, I don't know how the explan the average up and down at 68.6 @ 69.8
68.0- 2905
68.3- 2931
68.6- 2909
68.9- 2939
69.2- 2984
69.5- 2981
69.8- 2970
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top