Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6mm vs .22”
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2258400" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>A reasonable approach for sure. I have a 243 myself but it sees almost no use as I just like my .270 and .300 win mag a lot more and do indeed agree about the extra insurance factor if things aren't perfect and you don't want to have to pass up the opportunity. At ordinary hunting ranges (which to me means inside a quarter mile, 440 yards or so) I think the 270 is still the perfect deer rifle. Nothing does it better! But I won't rabbit trail this further haha (I'm bad for doing that, especially on my own threads)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2258400, member: 109862"] A reasonable approach for sure. I have a 243 myself but it sees almost no use as I just like my .270 and .300 win mag a lot more and do indeed agree about the extra insurance factor if things aren’t perfect and you don’t want to have to pass up the opportunity. At ordinary hunting ranges (which to me means inside a quarter mile, 440 yards or so) I think the 270 is still the perfect deer rifle. Nothing does it better! But I won’t rabbit trail this further haha (I’m bad for doing that, especially on my own threads) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6mm vs .22”
Top