Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6mm vs .22”
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2258185" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>Fair enough, can't argue with your experience. What I can say is that in mine there's no question that the 243 is a potent deer round, and also that varmint bullets are inappropriate indeed. While I can't recommend this if one is capable of mastering a larger round, I do know multiple women shooters who either simply can't handle big recoil or have a harder time carrying a rifle heavy enough to tame it and have successfully taken elk and moose with the round on many occasions. Good hunters, they take no "funny shots", wait till the creature is perfectly broadside and inside 300 yards and it's no big deal…despite claims of invincibility or requiring magnums (and I do prefer my 300 magnum), nothing can really go all that far if both it's lungs are truly wrecked. And small bore high velocity rounds are risky for shoulder shooting but extraordinary "lung poppers". </p><p></p><p>thanks for participating!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2258185, member: 109862"] Fair enough, can’t argue with your experience. What I can say is that in mine there’s no question that the 243 is a potent deer round, and also that varmint bullets are inappropriate indeed. While I can’t recommend this if one is capable of mastering a larger round, I do know multiple women shooters who either simply can’t handle big recoil or have a harder time carrying a rifle heavy enough to tame it and have successfully taken elk and moose with the round on many occasions. Good hunters, they take no “funny shots”, wait till the creature is perfectly broadside and inside 300 yards and it’s no big deal…despite claims of invincibility or requiring magnums (and I do prefer my 300 magnum), nothing can really go all that far if both it’s lungs are truly wrecked. And small bore high velocity rounds are risky for shoulder shooting but extraordinary “lung poppers”. thanks for participating! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6mm vs .22”
Top