Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300WSM vs. 300RCM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 340140" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>The biggest difference I see is case capacity. It looks to me that the RCM basically gives 30-06 performance in a short action. The average wieght bullet graph is interesting, but I dont put much stock in it. The WSM is very capable of shooting heavier bullets and will push them faster than the RCM. I'm not sure what average employed bullet weight means, but a 300 WSM shoots a 180 bullet very well. The advantage I see with the RCM is less recoil. Everything else goes to the WSM.</p><p> </p><p>Mark</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 340140, member: 11717"] The biggest difference I see is case capacity. It looks to me that the RCM basically gives 30-06 performance in a short action. The average wieght bullet graph is interesting, but I dont put much stock in it. The WSM is very capable of shooting heavier bullets and will push them faster than the RCM. I'm not sure what average employed bullet weight means, but a 300 WSM shoots a 180 bullet very well. The advantage I see with the RCM is less recoil. Everything else goes to the WSM. Mark [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300WSM vs. 300RCM
Top