300wm twist

Discussion in 'Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics' started by ohiohunter, Aug 10, 2018.

  1. ohiohunter

    ohiohunter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,556
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2012
    Thinking about getting a new barrel for my 300wm. Should I go w/ the 1:10 or the 1:9? I probably have more 215's than I'll shoot, but the option of 230's does sound appealing.
     
  2. elkaholic

    elkaholic Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,746
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    9
     
    Jud96, waltercrouse and HARPERC like this.
  3. WeiserBucks

    WeiserBucks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,096
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    My 10" twist 300 WM is excellent with the 215s, havnt tried the 230s.
     
  4. RockyMtnMT

    RockyMtnMT Official LRH Sponsor

    Messages:
    4,359
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    9

    Steve
     
    Jud96 likes this.
  5. NEMTHunter

    NEMTHunter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    415
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2014
    9 as well. A little more is better then not enough.
     
    Tikka270hunter and Jud96 like this.
  6. MagnumManiac

    MagnumManiac Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,351
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    I have 3 barrels in 300WM, all are 10” twist and all shoot the 215’s and 230’s just fine.
    Sure, a 9” twist is probably a safer bet, but I have NEVER had an issue with a 10” twist.
    I have a Palmer barrel in 300WM too, it has a 13” twist, IT WILL NOT stabilise ANYTHING above 168gr pills. PERIOD.

    Cheers.
    ;)
     
    Mike 338 likes this.
  7. jasent

    jasent Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    382
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    I always go a inch faster than needed to get the stability at extreme ranges. Also improves bc at distance. The extremely minor speed lose you get with a faster twist than needed makes up for its self at transonic and beyond
     
    HARPERC and RockyMtnMT like this.
  8. Mach 1

    Mach 1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    249
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2018
    Yea I agree with the 9 but the 10 would suffice. The new 230gr smk .8 bc bullets supposedly requires a 1 in 8 twist. I don't know how fast you burn out a barrel but it seems the bullet manufacturers keep upping the ante. I may try out a 8 twist on my next 300 wsm barrel.
     
    HARPERC and RockyMtnMT like this.
  9. reeldawg

    reeldawg Well-Known Member LRH Team Member

    Messages:
    527
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    If your doing a new build do a 9 twist. Longer bullets coming out you don’t know what’s around the corner.

    Jay
     
    Jud96 likes this.
  10. RockyMtnMT

    RockyMtnMT Official LRH Sponsor

    Messages:
    4,359
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    The faster twist will help with terminal performance. If deciding on a new barrel the choice to me is more between 8 and 9.

    Steve
     
  11. Hatrick

    Hatrick Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    412
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
     
  12. jasent

    jasent Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    382
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    I have shot light bullets in fast twist barrels. No troubles at all yet
     
  13. rfurman24

    rfurman24 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,463
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2010
    If 8 or 9 is available there is not question. 10 would not be an option for me. Sure I have had four 10 twists shooting 215s just fine but I would choose 8 first 9 second if available.
     
    Bucks4me2, reeldawg, HARPERC and 2 others like this.
  14. RockyMtnMT

    RockyMtnMT Official LRH Sponsor

    Messages:
    4,359
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Seems like most bullets now are much better made than years ago. Used to be guys would talk about over stabilizing a bullet. Too fast a twist would cause asymmetrical bullets to not stay true in flight. Not so sure about this, but remember reading about it. More likely could be a problem of jacket core separation in flight. This should not be a problem with well made bullets particularly bonded bullets. If you are running mono's like ours it is never a problem. It is being proven by the elr guys that long range accuracy is aided by faster twist. Several years ago Nemo was installing 8" twist barrels on their 300wm not because they wanted to run extra long bullets but because they found better accuracy at 1000y and beyond.

    From our testing, and as hunters, the faster twist will aid in proper terminal performance. In years past I hunted with marginal stability bullets because I wanted the higher bc. Accuracy was good so I never thought twice about it. Saw some questionable terminal performance and just chalked it up to poor bullet performance. I think many of the poor bullet performance issues that we hear about are due to marginal stability. Between marginal stability, hollow points plugged with tips, and tiny 1mm hollow points, it is a crap shoot whether the bullet will perform properly. When it comes to terminal performance it is more about the rpm's of the bullet vs the stability factor. We have found that an sg of 1.5 or higher calculated at sea level will result in better terminal performance. If you think of the bullet as a top spinning it will make more sense. A fast spinning top spins true for a long time if nothing touches it. As soon as friction is added to the top by touching it the rpm's degrade rapidly causing the top to wobble. The more rpm's the top has the more interference it can take before it starts to wobble. If a bullet is flying with yaw due to marginal stability, it can be very accurate, but the angel created by the yaw makes it harder for the hydraulics needed for expansion to get into the nose of the bullet. The more angle the bullet has the smaller the hollow point gets. In flight there almost no degradation of the rpm's. Once it impacts the rpm's rapidly degrade. As the rpm's degrade the bullet will try to tumble. This will cause the bullet to stop deforming properly and increase the risk of the bullet not tracking in a straight line. The higher the rpm's the longer the bullet stays point forward as it passes through the animal.

    When discovering this in low vel testing of our bullets all of a sudden poor bullet performance from years gone by started to make sense. I am no longer willing to hunt with marginal stability and try to set my rifles up with what would be considered "over stabilized" bullets. Terminal performance is simply more dramatic on game. I will shorten my game for higher stability vs lengthening my game by using marginally stabilized bullets in order to get higher bc bullets. If shooting rocks or targets the only thing that matters is accuracy, so using altitude to calculate stability for external ballistics is all that is needed. Altitude adds stability for flight due to thinner air, but it does not add any rpm's to the bullet. So as soon as the bullet touches the animal and the rpm's degrade it allows the bullet to get off axis more quickly.

    It is worth every hunters time to check this out. Our bullets are all listed with min twist rates for full stability at sea level or 1.5sg. This should be considered strongly for hunting.

    Steve
     
    phorwath, reeldawg, HARPERC and 4 others like this.