Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.300 win mag: pursuing 4000 feet per second.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2287569" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>It also depends very much on how you define barrel life. For benchrest accuracy sure…maybe…but I often wonder when people say their barrel is toast if they mean it can't shoot inside an inch and a half at 100 or if they mean it can't shoot inside a half inch. World of difference. Also wonder if people read too much into throat erosion/visible signs of wear seen through a bore scope. Declaring a barrel is visibly done for inside, never mind the fact that for most field applications it's still more than adequate. </p><p></p><p>Probably the same mentality that talks about "bullet failure" as determined by some arbitrary weight retention requirement a bullet "failed" to meet - never mind that the person knows how much weight it retained because they successfully recovered it from a dead animal!!!!!!<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" />. Failure indeed….</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2287569, member: 109862"] It also depends very much on how you define barrel life. For benchrest accuracy sure…maybe…but I often wonder when people say their barrel is toast if they mean it can’t shoot inside an inch and a half at 100 or if they mean it can’t shoot inside a half inch. World of difference. Also wonder if people read too much into throat erosion/visible signs of wear seen through a bore scope. Declaring a barrel is visibly done for inside, never mind the fact that for most field applications it’s still more than adequate. Probably the same mentality that talks about “bullet failure” as determined by some arbitrary weight retention requirement a bullet “failed” to meet - never mind that the person knows how much weight it retained because they successfully recovered it from a dead animal!!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Failure indeed…. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.300 win mag: pursuing 4000 feet per second.
Top