Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 win mag vs 6.5x300 weatherby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimmyCP" data-source="post: 1472347" data-attributes="member: 106166"><p>My buddy just got the 6.5- 300 he's not very happy with it. Not many options in bullets. As he put it, has the bark of a great Dane but the bite of a poodle. Alot of wasted energy in the chamber set up. </p><p>If you reload, .264 with slower burning powder works great with good barrel life for a hunter. Gets the bad rep of a barrel burner from competition shooters and from the early 60's when the powders were faster burning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimmyCP, post: 1472347, member: 106166"] My buddy just got the 6.5- 300 he's not very happy with it. Not many options in bullets. As he put it, has the bark of a great Dane but the bite of a poodle. Alot of wasted energy in the chamber set up. If you reload, .264 with slower burning powder works great with good barrel life for a hunter. Gets the bad rep of a barrel burner from competition shooters and from the early 60's when the powders were faster burning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 win mag vs 6.5x300 weatherby
Top