300WSM or 300 mag ?

Nuclear Worker said:

If you were going to get one for Elk hunting which would you get. Don't plan on shooting more than 600 yards. I had a 300WSM and shot an Elk at 535 yards ran 20 yards. Sold it to help pay for a 6.5x284 for my sheep hunt. Have never had a 300 mag. I know my 6.5 would get it done at 600 but would like something with a little more for that shot if I don't make the perfect shot and end up in the shoulder

Click to expand...

MagnumManiac said:

I know you wanna shoot Elk, but you haven't made suggestions on WHAT bullets you intend to use.
IMHO, the choice between these 2 cases all boils down to bullet choice.
My mate has a WSM, I have several 300WM's, a 300 Bee and a 300 RUM.
They all use different bullet weights.
If I were going to use 180g bullets exclusively, then the WSM is fine for that, it only gives up a 100fps or so to the WM.
If I planned on using 200g bullets, then the WM will handle that better, more capacity, therefore higher velocities.
My mate uses 165g Barnes TTSX in his WSM, funny thing is, this is the only ammo I could get for my 300 RUM. Have fires 3 shots sighting the rifle in so far, it boots quite a bit!
As to brass availability, here in Australia at present, WSM brass is on the shelves, Norma, Remington and Winchester are all in stock, however WM brass is no where to be seen, as is Weatherby or RUM.
We had no brass in stock other than 30-06 for a very long time starting in 2017. It is only the last 2 years that most cartridge cases are back in stock and now we get another lack of stock.
Anyway, the 300WM will most likely always be in stock somewhere.

Cheers.

Click to expand...

Nuclear Worker said:

Not sure what bullets I'm going to use. The only one I reload for is my 6.5x284. Quite new to the reloading and long range game. Will probably be factory ammunition to start. I have shot an Elk at 525 with a 300WSM. Was just curious if the 300wm was maybe better as I sold my 300WSM to help pay for my sheep hunt 6.5x284.

Click to expand...

Dentite said:

I think if the 300 WSM was the first to come out, then the 300 Win Mag came out, the 300 WSM would be the more popular one. Because with a shorter action, a shorter barrel, less powder and less recoil, it nips at the heels of the Win Mag with bullets 180 grain or less. Bit the beauty is we have choices.

Here's what I would say to help you make your decision.

Do you reload? If no, get the Win Mag.

Do you plan on using bullets in the 200 grain class? If yes, get the Win Mag.

Does action and barrel length matter to you? If you want the shortest possible for good performance, get the WSM.

If you want every last bit of velocity possible, get the Win Mag.

If efficiency matters to you, ie getting the same result with less powder, less recoil, less barrel length, less action length, get the WSM.

If a belt on your case bothers you, get the WSM.

Hope that helps.

Click to expand...

Nuclear Worker said:

Thanks as usual this opened a can of worms. Almost more confused than before I asked.

Click to expand...

Nuclear Worker said:

I don't want to shoot the shoulder but if I make a bad shot and hit the shoulder. I think I would be better with the larger caliber?

Click to expand...

FEENIX said:

This is why "I" never ask what rifle to buy or build.

Click to expand...

Nuclear Worker said:

I am still here just taking in all the comments and trying to make decision.

Click to expand...

scope-eye said:

I have both and if I had to give up one of them the WSM would have to go. There is nothing wrong with it, it's just another 30 cal that came along when there was really no void in the 30 cal
market. And that goes for all my WSMs, what ever the caliber my belted version does it better.
:IE 6mm MachIV, 257wby, 264wm, 270wby, 7RemMag and of course the 300wm.

Dean

Click to expand...

ndking1126 said:

But you sure like to post this statement every time someone does!!

Click to expand...