New (kinda) technique to develop a load

and i quote
"I have another graph that shows the group centers for each charge weight plotted on a quadratic chart"
Are you going through a rough time in ur life? You've made ur point, let it go.
At this point ur doing the online equivalent of running behind someone yelling at them while they're walking away from an argument.
 
i am not running behind anyone when they keep making silly claims.
i am retired, waiting on some parts and calmer weather, so i have time to
call a spade a spade, when i see bs i point it out so other have the opportunity to NOT make the same errors.
ya have a good weekend
 
Speaking of wasting time, I'm done with this, I have to get ready to shoot a few pigs tonight. Have a good day
If you click on the annoying ones name it gives you the option to IGNORE, sure makes the forum a lot better place when you get a couple of the trouble makers crap blocked from showing up on your screen.
 
I was actually intrigued with the OP, overlapping multiple pieces of data onto 1 chart. I'm 62, my career path was data driven. You don't get this kind of data for your rifle/load from a book.
I will be happy to see a follow up report from the OP, should the person decide to share with us, after this conversation got derailed.
A fresh look at gathering data and correlating it is pretty slick, combined with targets we hope to see next post. I'm interested and maybe make me a better handloader. That's why I'm here listening to the trusted voices on this site as I have learned much from most of you.
 
1013311D-04C3-4195-B939-9DDB7F7826C8.jpeg
Used the Berger method to find the "seet spot" for seating depth and repeated the ocw/ladder test. If someone had the time (I don't) they could do things like radial SD, hit probably and other statistical calculations that would tell more than just max group size and it could give you percent confidence in the data you collected. Just my small contribution take to for what it is.
 
One interesting thing is how the "node" didn't really change relative to seating depth changes. But this is only one test with a small sample size.
 
One interesting thing is how the "node" didn't really change relative to seating depth changes. But this is only one test with a small sample size.
Super job! My Spreadsheet skills diminished rapidly after retirement. I understand that creating spreadsheets and recording data sets is a big undertaking. Hoping you stick with it and share as you find time. You gotta love data driven results.
 
i am not running behind anyone when they keep making silly claims.
i am retired, waiting on some parts and calmer weather, so i have time to
call a spade a spade, when i see bs i point it out so other have the opportunity to NOT make the same errors.
ya have a good weekend
(grumpy old man waving his cane)....you kids get the hell off my lawn!...
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top