Load work up...seating depth test first OR charge weight first?

Seating depth first or optimal charge weight first?

  • Seating depth

    Votes: 6 85.7%

  • Charge weight

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • Total voters
    7
Just joined this site because this thread was so informative. I haven't read all the way through it, but I have the opposite problem of short magazine length in my 6.5X55 Swede. I can't get a bullet anywhere near the lands. The amount of bearing surface of the bullet in the neck gets to be dangerously low if I try. I just try to get a minimum of .150" bearing surface and then verify that the round chambers. I don't want to go lower in a hunting situation, so I don't test with less. In my other rifles, I will be trying the reduced load with seating depth testing first. I had heard that the optimum seating depth is independent of charge, but not vice versa
 
barefooter56 said:
So basically .003 TO .005. which direction?
Click to expand...

If .020 shot great at a lower powder charge, I would shoot groups of .006 each direction going .003 at a time cause i know i am close. With my 28 Nosler, when i ran a node close to 3000 FPS .020 off was most accurate. The picture i showed above was coming out of that node and go back into another higher node. The 3 shot group on bottom right was at .026 off. I originally stuck with .020 off and increased powder .3 grains at a time and had a flat spot in the 3050 range. This was found while shooting a ladder at .020 off but the three shots were a horizontal group. So i knew that over .9 grains had an ES of 8 but my seating depth was off a touch. The horizontal group was 1.75" at 300 yards with no vertical.
 
Rich that is a great example.

What really floors me is the Fed's match primer with the most consistent velocity having the second largest group size average. Just seems contradictory to what "should" happen!
 
Rhovee said:
If .020 shot great at a lower powder charge, I would shoot groups of .006 each direction going .003 at a time cause i know i am close. With my 28 Nosler, when i ran a node close to 3000 FPS .020 off was most accurate. The picture i showed above was coming out of that node and go back into another higher node. The 3 shot group on bottom right was at .026 off. I originally stuck with .020 off and increased powder .3 grains at a time and had a flat spot in the 3050 range. This was found while shooting a ladder at .020 off but the three shots were a horizontal group. So i knew that over .9 grains had an ES of 8 but my seating depth was off a touch. The horizontal group was 1.75" at 300 yards with no vertical.
Click to expand...

Thanks for this info. So you have found that the rough seating depth sweet spot holds across different charge weights but you may need to fine tune a few thous one way or another once you have found the node your looking for?
 
Yes I have found that to be correct. It can obviously make different shapes and move horizontal and vertical until it fine tuned. It's defently not as bad as group you will see when your way off your seating depth.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Similar threads

3
seating depth or charge weight first?
2
Replies
18
Views
7K
Mikecr
Mikecr
njshooter
Seating depth or charge weight ?
2
Replies
15
Views
6K
just country
J
nksmfamjp
Which comes first, the chicken or the egg? Charge weight or seating depth…
2 3 4
Replies
42
Views
5K
P7M13
P7M13
T
Find seating depth or powder charge first on VLD's?
2 3
Replies
33
Views
16K
twoftagl
T
Lonewolf74
Load development: Seating depth VS Charge weight
2 3
Replies
29
Views
9K
RockyMtnMT
RockyMtnMT

Recent Posts

Top