Muzzle brakes...

Id recommend Hawkins precision for a basic side port brake without rear draft. They are still surprisingly effective. Muzzle brakes n more will be coming out with a non draft brake soon as well with a port design that should be more effective. All will put a lot of blast on you, but the ones with out draft will put less debris on you. A lot of the blast has to do with muzzle pressure, fast powders and long barrels make brakes seem nicer. I have gone full circle on this and have decided IF Im using a brake it will be a good one, so muzzle brakes and more or terminator brakes for me now. Lay down a mat for range or practice sessions.
 
I have a suppressor in the works and have for the better part of 8 months now...
I ordered this one for my hunting rig. I'm not sure it's suitable for my rifle with the brake/concussion issues I've mentioned above. Anybody have any real life experience with a supressor that can hold up and is intended for the magnums?
 
Last edited:
I have a suppressor in the works and have for the better part of 8 months now...
I ordered this one for my hunting rig. I'm not sure it's suitable for my rifle with the brake/concussion issues I've mentioned above. Anybody have any real life experience with a brake that can hold up and is intended for the magnums?

Did you mean to ask for experience with a suppressor holding up? Because that's not really a concern I've ever heard of with a brake.

If you are worried about a suppressor the first thing I'd look at is the manufacturer's rating. Typically they will give a cartridge and barrel length it's rated for.
 
Did you mean to ask for experience with a suppressor holding up? Because that's not really a concern I've ever heard of with a brake.

If you are worried about a suppressor the first thing I'd look at is the manufacturer's rating. Typically they will give a cartridge and barrel length it's rated for.



I meant to say supressor... I changed the words around. I'd rather go overkill some instead of being on the verge with something. 300 ultra and 300 prc are my 2 I'm talking about. 300 ultra 28" barrel. 300 prc is 26" barrel
 
I'm running a vias brake on a 9 pound 30 nosler.

It's just enough recoil reduction for repeated load work from the bench without excessive noise or blowback. It's what I wanted and what my smith suggested. No issues with shooting prone as well with it.

Screenshot_20200823-090344_Gallery.jpg
 
I was finally able to get a suppressor for my a Lapua. I don't ever want to shoot that rifle without a suppressor again. The noise reduction is nice but the percussion reduction is the best part of a suppressed gun. I feel bad for hunters/shooters in states that do not allow suppressors.
 
I shoot a braked .300 Weatherby. I have never experienced a headache from shooting. I wear a pair of ear plugs plus a good set of electronic headphones.
 
I meant to say supressor... I changed the words around. I'd rather go overkill some instead of being on the verge with something. 300 ultra and 300 prc are my 2 I'm talking about. 300 ultra 28" barrel. 300 prc is 26" barrel

I have an Eliteiron Bravo on my .30 LARA (improved .300 Jarrett) custom rifle and it is rated for (.300 RUM/.30-378 WBTY). It works great on my .300 WM, .300 WSM, .270 AI, .264 WM, 6.5 CM.
 
I have a 300 RUM that is a Rem 700 thumbhole stock, Krieger hvy bbl with a vais brake. Shooting 210 gr Bergers @3150 off the bench is no problem....years ago I used a Gentry quiet brake, worked great for noise, recoil was ok. I now have a TB ultra 9, haven't tried it on the 300 yet, but won't shoot without it if possible....these new brakes are impressive, but the noise signature is God awful! I shoot in a match where a guy shoots a 6.5 PRC, and nobody wants to shoot, or even stand behind him when he shoots....maybe less is more when it comes to recoil and noise
 

That is one of two radials I tried earlier in my quest for effective MBs and I could not get rid of it quickly enough. Respectfully, not my personal preference esp. when there are plenty of choices that are far more effective.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top