Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Why not a 300 wby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolf76" data-source="post: 1593640" data-attributes="member: 75779"><p>If I need more hp than my 300 wm, the 300 bee doesn't come to mind. That's when the 33 cals come play. </p><p>The 300 bee is closer to the 30-378 bee in terms of practical use. How many of those do you see comparatively? The whole diminishing returns principle really shows. </p><p>I suspect Roy would have chambered(freebore) his guns differently if slower powders would have been more widely available.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolf76, post: 1593640, member: 75779"] If I need more hp than my 300 wm, the 300 bee doesn't come to mind. That's when the 33 cals come play. The 300 bee is closer to the 30-378 bee in terms of practical use. How many of those do you see comparatively? The whole diminishing returns principle really shows. I suspect Roy would have chambered(freebore) his guns differently if slower powders would have been more widely available. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Why not a 300 wby?
Top