Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why No Love For 270 Ackley Improved?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dean2" data-source="post: 2188322" data-attributes="member: 26077"><p>Short and too the point, also spot on. With an Ackley you end up with a round that doesn't feed as well, you never see a dangerous game rifle with a 40 degree shoulder, and next to no gain in velocity unless you run higher or over pressure loads. Most of Ackley's performance gains were from running significantly higher pressures, and not near as much from the change in case shape. If you want proof, run the loads through Quick Load.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dean2, post: 2188322, member: 26077"] Short and too the point, also spot on. With an Ackley you end up with a round that doesn't feed as well, you never see a dangerous game rifle with a 40 degree shoulder, and next to no gain in velocity unless you run higher or over pressure loads. Most of Ackley's performance gains were from running significantly higher pressures, and not near as much from the change in case shape. If you want proof, run the loads through Quick Load. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why No Love For 270 Ackley Improved?
Top