Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
why a 7mm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="angus-5024" data-source="post: 484455" data-attributes="member: 10306"><p>Pitbull,</p><p>Ahh... I was wondering if this one would bite me. It is not theory it is <strong>Fact </strong>that if you shoot a .338 cal bullet weighing 300 grains going 2900fps that fragments it will leave a more dramatic wound channel than a .243 cal-105gain bullet that fragments going 2900fps. it goes the same for controlled expansion bullets. </p><p>I suppose I could have said useing the same bullet design. If you compare apples to apples you get apples.</p><p> </p><p>I shoot a .338 almost exclusively bt the way, I just like the smaller cals too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="angus-5024, post: 484455, member: 10306"] Pitbull, Ahh... I was wondering if this one would bite me. It is not theory it is [B]Fact [/B]that if you shoot a .338 cal bullet weighing 300 grains going 2900fps that fragments it will leave a more dramatic wound channel than a .243 cal-105gain bullet that fragments going 2900fps. it goes the same for controlled expansion bullets. I suppose I could have said useing the same bullet design. If you compare apples to apples you get apples. I shoot a .338 almost exclusively bt the way, I just like the smaller cals too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
why a 7mm
Top