Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Polls
Which shooting chronograph do you use?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 839523" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p><strong>Greyfox</strong> experienced and stated the handicap.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This affect on group size and POI is to be anticipated. If it's not a substantial handicap to you, then it just means you don't personally consider it 'substantial'. Others, including myself, will.</p><p></p><p>Two years ago I had a manufacturer rep ask me if I was interested in testing their prototype of a magnetospeed in concert with my chronographs. I don't know if that was the manufacturer of what is now known as the Magnetospeed or not. I wasn't interested because I knew I couldn't perform load development with the unit fastened to the muzzle of my barrel. I wasn't interested in wasting ammunition just to see if their unit functioned consistent with my chronographs. If I could have developed hunting loads at the same time I shot with their unit hanging off the muzzle, I would have volunteered.</p><p></p><p>For LRHs that don't chronograph their loads during load development, or for shooters that don't reload their own ammo and shoot factory ammo, this handicap may be inconsequential.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 839523, member: 4191"] [B]Greyfox[/B] experienced and stated the handicap. This affect on group size and POI is to be anticipated. If it's not a substantial handicap to you, then it just means you don't personally consider it 'substantial'. Others, including myself, will. Two years ago I had a manufacturer rep ask me if I was interested in testing their prototype of a magnetospeed in concert with my chronographs. I don't know if that was the manufacturer of what is now known as the Magnetospeed or not. I wasn't interested because I knew I couldn't perform load development with the unit fastened to the muzzle of my barrel. I wasn't interested in wasting ammunition just to see if their unit functioned consistent with my chronographs. If I could have developed hunting loads at the same time I shot with their unit hanging off the muzzle, I would have volunteered. For LRHs that don't chronograph their loads during load development, or for shooters that don't reload their own ammo and shoot factory ammo, this handicap may be inconsequential. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Polls
Which shooting chronograph do you use?
Top