Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Which is better, 300 RUM or 338 RUM?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brent" data-source="post: 6022" data-attributes="member: 99"><p>I think the 200gr Accubond would be the great comprimise... if they shoot well in your gun. <img src="http://images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> They kill anything well, but the 165 Interbond would too. The difference between the 180 and 165 isn't much at 600 yards but compare the 240 SMK and the 165 at 800 and now they start parting ways. <img src="http://images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> Using the heavier bullet will help with retained weight as well as it running a bit slower ta boot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brent, post: 6022, member: 99"] I think the 200gr Accubond would be the great comprimise... if they shoot well in your gun. [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] They kill anything well, but the 165 Interbond would too. The difference between the 180 and 165 isn't much at 600 yards but compare the 240 SMK and the 165 at 800 and now they start parting ways. [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] Using the heavier bullet will help with retained weight as well as it running a bit slower ta boot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Which is better, 300 RUM or 338 RUM?
Top