Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Polls
What is your preferred scope reticle calibration?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 698642" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>MOA is more intuitive for Americans -for hold-offs.</p><p>Our distance reference is in INCHES, and MOA is closer & higher definition w/resp to INCHES.</p><p>Even better for us is IPHY, which most scopes must ultimately be measured & taken to for accuracy(even though marketed as MOA -few are).</p><p></p><p>MILs work for rough optical ranging, but LRFs way better cover this function.</p><p>Given LRFs, there is no longer a real basis for FFP scopes, or MILs.</p><p>Never liked either anyway..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 698642, member: 1521"] MOA is more intuitive for Americans -for hold-offs. Our distance reference is in INCHES, and MOA is closer & higher definition w/resp to INCHES. Even better for us is IPHY, which most scopes must ultimately be measured & taken to for accuracy(even though marketed as MOA -few are). MILs work for rough optical ranging, but LRFs way better cover this function. Given LRFs, there is no longer a real basis for FFP scopes, or MILs. Never liked either anyway.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Polls
What is your preferred scope reticle calibration?
Top