Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
What is better than the Weatherby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ranger Rick" data-source="post: 2106439" data-attributes="member: 111184"><p>My goodness swamp lord, has the number 7 ever pushed you into a whirlpool of cynicism. The truth is that <u>both</u> the .284* and .300 calibers are effective and terrific calibers (and many would agree that the .270 could be included. Oops, I used a 7. If you prefer, let's call it a 6.8mm).</p><p>Ponder these "sensible" comparisons: 7mm-08 vs .308; 6.8mm vs 30-06; and 7mm REM mag vs 300 win mag. The verifiable ballistics data proves that the 7s do work very well.</p><p>Plus there are several well-written articles on 7's and .30s that finish with the same conclusion: <em>both</em> calibers are fantastic! I'm not sure why you passed judgment on the 300 PRC in such a degrading way: "screw the 300PRC." That standard does nothing for the 300 win mag as its ballistics prove that the 300 win mag comes in 2nd when compared head-to-head to 300PRC.</p><p>Your rambling paragraphs managed to have some good stuff as you herald <strong>the one and only 340 Wby</strong>, but as sure as Alaska has swamp, you find a way to put down the 338 Lapua and the 338 RUM.</p><p>But behold, the one and only 340 Wby king has fallen to its knees, being soundly defeated by almighty "<strong>The 7.82 Warbird</strong>." "Holy Zoom, Zoom, Batman, that was a 7.82 Warbird!" Chirped Robin.</p><p>Swamplord, you wisely, but by accident no less, finally wrapped up your sarcasm and disdain for the 7mm by declaring to the masses that the 300 RUM is the Warbird's prince and the best of the factory bunch.</p><p>Closing out your masterpiece, you recklessly toss around your f-word: <strong>fluff. </strong>Your broad use of the word fluff conjures up despair and "-bs" to your readers.</p><p>Here's something to think about - everyone has a right to have his own opinion, and with all the chaos in today's world, don't you agree that it's better to be encouraging or silent instead of tossing out criticism and dogmatic criticism when someone shares his opinion?</p><p>Have a great weekend up in the beautiful state of Alaska <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😊" title="Smiling face with smiling eyes :blush:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60a.png" data-shortname=":blush:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ranger Rick, post: 2106439, member: 111184"] My goodness swamp lord, has the number 7 ever pushed you into a whirlpool of cynicism. The truth is that [U]both[/U] the .284* and .300 calibers are effective and terrific calibers (and many would agree that the .270 could be included. Oops, I used a 7. If you prefer, let’s call it a 6.8mm). Ponder these “sensible” comparisons: 7mm-08 vs .308; 6.8mm vs 30-06; and 7mm REM mag vs 300 win mag. The verifiable ballistics data proves that the 7s do work very well. Plus there are several well-written articles on 7’s and .30s that finish with the same conclusion: [I]both[/I] calibers are fantastic! I’m not sure why you passed judgment on the 300 PRC in such a degrading way: “screw the 300PRC.” That standard does nothing for the 300 win mag as its ballistics prove that the 300 win mag comes in 2nd when compared head-to-head to 300PRC. Your rambling paragraphs managed to have some good stuff as you herald [B]the one and only 340 Wby[/B], but as sure as Alaska has swamp, you find a way to put down the 338 Lapua and the 338 RUM. But behold, the one and only 340 Wby king has fallen to its knees, being soundly defeated by almighty “[B]The 7.82 Warbird[/B].” “Holy Zoom, Zoom, Batman, that was a 7.82 Warbird!” Chirped Robin. Swamplord, you wisely, but by accident no less, finally wrapped up your sarcasm and disdain for the 7mm by declaring to the masses that the 300 RUM is the Warbird’s prince and the best of the factory bunch. Closing out your masterpiece, you recklessly toss around your f-word: [B]fluff. [/B]Your broad use of the word fluff conjures up despair and “-bs” to your readers. Here’s something to think about - everyone has a right to have his own opinion, and with all the chaos in today’s world, don’t you agree that it’s better to be encouraging or silent instead of tossing out criticism and dogmatic criticism when someone shares his opinion? Have a great weekend up in the beautiful state of Alaska 😊 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
What is better than the Weatherby?
Top