Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
What do you think they should get?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike Matteson" data-source="post: 2763109" data-attributes="member: 101791"><p>That isn't strange! It just show how stupid we are. We spend ourselves into a hole in the name of pollutions. By the way that doesn't work, if people would take the time and read about all these items being built in the name of pollution free. Most of it zeroed out or worst, because of what it takes to make the equipment or product. So building of the pollution free items make more pollution than they save over time of use. </p><p>It's Stupid! Atomic is far cheaper and less pollutions too. The reactors create less pollutions and are by far safer too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike Matteson, post: 2763109, member: 101791"] That isn't strange! It just show how stupid we are. We spend ourselves into a hole in the name of pollutions. By the way that doesn't work, if people would take the time and read about all these items being built in the name of pollution free. Most of it zeroed out or worst, because of what it takes to make the equipment or product. So building of the pollution free items make more pollution than they save over time of use. It's Stupid! Atomic is far cheaper and less pollutions too. The reactors create less pollutions and are by far safer too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
What do you think they should get?
Top