Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
WA: 4 billionaires outspent poor gun owners 16:1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="436" data-source="post: 1010154" data-attributes="member: 16609"><p>It's really funny how the elitist billionaires get involved in these kinda issues. You've kinda got too ask yourself why? The sheeple that follow them I can understand their reasoning, they don't know any better, they've lived most their lives under the liberal buffoonery and lies when it comes to safety and the 2nd Amendment. </p><p></p><p>However; the "mega rich".. Not the rich'.., just the mega rich'…, as you look at then'.., an as I look at them what I see is a group of people that have a security bubble around them and their family's 24/7 the best money can buy, former top tier operators, well armed and well paid to handle any problem that might come their way. Their security detail would make the White House envious.</p><p>So'.., why do they care if I buy my neighbors gun, or that I like to hunt or target shoot, they really don't; anymore then they really care about crime and whether criminals get guns. Well then; do they really think these types of laws can stop criminals from getting firearms? Who know; if they "do".. they need to get out more.</p><p></p><p>So what are they really afraid of? I think it's you and me. These people control the biggest part of the economy and the Government, their directly responsible for a whole lot of what happens in the Nation, both "good" and "bad". Their afraid someday the people will come for them, and if the people are well armed their security details may not be able to take care of the problem. So they, like many other elitist over the time of man kind try and compensate by making laws that make law abiding people criminals and at the same time restrict and track firearms for future information. </p><p></p><p>If you look at Washington State Initiative 594 it's clear that it's not going to work nor does the State have the money to fund it. How you going to track or dispute something that you don't even know the person has. So the next step is full registration and tracking becomes easy. While at the same time, "it" the State will start a fee(s) and tax(s) probably on sales and possession, that makes it a whole lot easier to put a face to the firearm. Of course it does nothing to keep guns out of the hand of criminal and crazy's.</p><p></p><p>That's what the mega rich really want, and those liberal sheeple most likely will give it to them in Washington State. As long as they have their weed life is good. </p><p></p><p>Just my thoughts..</p><p>436</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="436, post: 1010154, member: 16609"] It’s really funny how the elitist billionaires get involved in these kinda issues. You've kinda got too ask yourself why? The sheeple that follow them I can understand their reasoning, they don’t know any better, they've lived most their lives under the liberal buffoonery and lies when it comes to safety and the 2nd Amendment. However; the “mega rich”.. Not the rich’.., just the mega rich’…, as you look at then’.., an as I look at them what I see is a group of people that have a security bubble around them and their family's 24/7 the best money can buy, former top tier operators, well armed and well paid to handle any problem that might come their way. Their security detail would make the White House envious. So’.., why do they care if I buy my neighbors gun, or that I like to hunt or target shoot, they really don’t; anymore then they really care about crime and whether criminals get guns. Well then; do they really think these types of laws can stop criminals from getting firearms? Who know; if they "do".. they need to get out more. So what are they really afraid of? I think it’s you and me. These people control the biggest part of the economy and the Government, their directly responsible for a whole lot of what happens in the Nation, both "good" and "bad". Their afraid someday the people will come for them, and if the people are well armed their security details may not be able to take care of the problem. So they, like many other elitist over the time of man kind try and compensate by making laws that make law abiding people criminals and at the same time restrict and track firearms for future information. If you look at Washington State Initiative 594 it’s clear that it’s not going to work nor does the State have the money to fund it. How you going to track or dispute something that you don’t even know the person has. So the next step is full registration and tracking becomes easy. While at the same time, “it” the State will start a fee(s) and tax(s) probably on sales and possession, that makes it a whole lot easier to put a face to the firearm. Of course it does nothing to keep guns out of the hand of criminal and crazy’s. That's what the mega rich really want, and those liberal sheeple most likely will give it to them in Washington State. As long as they have their weed life is good. Just my thoughts.. 436 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
WA: 4 billionaires outspent poor gun owners 16:1
Top