Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Tight chamber: resizing loading ammo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="del2les" data-source="post: 1766094" data-attributes="member: 9299"><p>We are seeing this more and more from "target", "match" or "minimum" headspace chambers. I have seen, and heard about more, target 308's, 223, a 222 and a couple of others. Some of these came with chambers/necks far too short/tight to feed several factory ammos. One 308 target came with a chamber that was .003" below minimum headspace, and one varmint barrel was cut with a neck .015" shorter than spec. </p><p></p><p>Minimum chambers have their place, but they can have their own issues too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="del2les, post: 1766094, member: 9299"] We are seeing this more and more from "target", "match" or "minimum" headspace chambers. I have seen, and heard about more, target 308's, 223, a 222 and a couple of others. Some of these came with chambers/necks far too short/tight to feed several factory ammos. One 308 target came with a chamber that was .003" below minimum headspace, and one varmint barrel was cut with a neck .015" shorter than spec. Minimum chambers have their place, but they can have their own issues too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Tight chamber: resizing loading ammo
Top