Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Solid Bullet Debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="noel carlson" data-source="post: 290992" data-attributes="member: 16138"><p>Thanks MR,</p><p> </p><p>The "better" ELRH bullet will be unveiled in two to three months with accompanying photographs, external/terminal ballistic data, and commentary by individuals who performed beta-testing.</p><p> </p><p>Your caution on terminal stability is my only real concern, given the caliber/length ratio. So far no problems, but internal target tumbling is always a point of focus in a VLD design. </p><p> </p><p>Best,</p><p>Noel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="noel carlson, post: 290992, member: 16138"] Thanks MR, The "better" ELRH bullet will be unveiled in two to three months with accompanying photographs, external/terminal ballistic data, and commentary by individuals who performed beta-testing. Your caution on terminal stability is my only real concern, given the caliber/length ratio. So far no problems, but internal target tumbling is always a point of focus in a VLD design. Best, Noel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Solid Bullet Debate
Top