Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Solid Bullet Debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="noel carlson" data-source="post: 290874" data-attributes="member: 16138"><p>Good information Michael... am I going out on a limb in assuming that, by it's nature, 338 caliber is not a diameter which has an application utilizing the "complete" fragmentation kill strategy?</p><p> </p><p>It sounds as though 30 caliber, and below, is where the explosive option becomes viable... and then only as a <em>preference</em>. The special case jmason describes, where the projectile needs to be contained within the animal, appears to be the sole condition <em>requiring</em> a frangible. </p><p> </p><p>Best,</p><p>Noel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="noel carlson, post: 290874, member: 16138"] Good information Michael... am I going out on a limb in assuming that, by it's nature, 338 caliber is not a diameter which has an application utilizing the "complete" fragmentation kill strategy? It sounds as though 30 caliber, and below, is where the explosive option becomes viable... and then only as a [I]preference[/I]. The special case jmason describes, where the projectile needs to be contained within the animal, appears to be the sole condition [I]requiring[/I] a frangible. Best, Noel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Solid Bullet Debate
Top