Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Solid Bullet Debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 289628" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>Michael,</p><p> </p><p>I basically agree with you, but I think Noel has already said that his comment to Eric was "over the top"</p><p> </p><p>Hopefully this discussion will continue with mutual respect. I find it very intersting and informative. It's not often you get bullet designers/makers and ballisticians of the caliber we have in this discussion. Now all we need is for Grerard to join in... </p><p>-MR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 289628, member: 11717"] Michael, I basically agree with you, but I think Noel has already said that his comment to Eric was "over the top" Hopefully this discussion will continue with mutual respect. I find it very intersting and informative. It's not often you get bullet designers/makers and ballisticians of the caliber we have in this discussion. Now all we need is for Grerard to join in... -MR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Solid Bullet Debate
Top