Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
The LRF Wars. Is it really that bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Target Tamers" data-source="post: 1495787" data-attributes="member: 106478"><p>I like Sig. They're pretty darn on accurate imo, but I think their reticle turns out to be a little bigger than Leica's one when you're ranging out long distances making it a little harder for positive target acquisition. </p><p></p><p>Almost got the Leupold RX2800 tbr, but that will have to wait until next year. Reviews are slim on it right now because it's new to 2018. It looks awesome. 6-2800 yards with deer up to 1700 yards. Really curious to see though if it can actually perform to these claims. If it can, it's one heck of a deal I'm willing to pull the trigger on. </p><p></p><p>The Leica 1600-R goes out to 1600 yards, but I'm not sure what its deer yardage is. Right now, the 1600 and the 2000 are pretty much the same price. I'd go with the 2000 personally. </p><p></p><p>I believe all 4 of these options don't allow for inputting custom ballistic info, but you can choose ballistics from a preloaded chart to match your loads. They all have angle compensation readouts. </p><p></p><p>If I had to choose brand new - it's Leica all the way approx just less than $500 for either models. If I'm on a strict budget, I'd take the lightly used, new to 2018 Leupold from your friend for approx $300.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Target Tamers, post: 1495787, member: 106478"] I like Sig. They're pretty darn on accurate imo, but I think their reticle turns out to be a little bigger than Leica's one when you're ranging out long distances making it a little harder for positive target acquisition. Almost got the Leupold RX2800 tbr, but that will have to wait until next year. Reviews are slim on it right now because it's new to 2018. It looks awesome. 6-2800 yards with deer up to 1700 yards. Really curious to see though if it can actually perform to these claims. If it can, it's one heck of a deal I'm willing to pull the trigger on. The Leica 1600-R goes out to 1600 yards, but I'm not sure what its deer yardage is. Right now, the 1600 and the 2000 are pretty much the same price. I'd go with the 2000 personally. I believe all 4 of these options don't allow for inputting custom ballistic info, but you can choose ballistics from a preloaded chart to match your loads. They all have angle compensation readouts. If I had to choose brand new - it's Leica all the way approx just less than $500 for either models. If I'm on a strict budget, I'd take the lightly used, new to 2018 Leupold from your friend for approx $300. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
The LRF Wars. Is it really that bad?
Top