Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Texas State State Rep. Briscoe Cain
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gregg C" data-source="post: 1712154" data-attributes="member: 103471"><p>I'm on the same page. People that know me well could make the argument that I myself am unstable. Got a real short fuse, unfortunately. And yet, when it comes to my rights, especially my firearms rights, I am totally cognizant of putting them in peril. My rights, I mean. I will not have even one beer, and climb behind the wheel of a car. Arizona leaves it up to the officers discretion as to wether you are impaired. A BAL of .01 can result in a conviction. I won't risk it. </p><p></p><p>Another aspect that worries me is taxation. Several politicians on the horizon are touting VAT taxes as a way to generate revenue. These are hidden in the cost of goods, and therefore, we would not really know what we are paying. These are sure to be applied to ammo, components, and the evil firearms themselves, effectively pricing them out of reach of most folk that I know. What part of ".....shall not be infringed." do they not get ? In legalise, the word SHALL is one of if not the most powerful word in the language, yet we are getting stomped on hard. After all, if it saves just one life, rite ? " Some rights have a limit" according to Lindsay Graham. And I'm afraid that is a prevailing sentiment in our ruling class. Ruling class ? Wait, did I say that ?....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gregg C, post: 1712154, member: 103471"] I'm on the same page. People that know me well could make the argument that I myself am unstable. Got a real short fuse, unfortunately. And yet, when it comes to my rights, especially my firearms rights, I am totally cognizant of putting them in peril. My rights, I mean. I will not have even one beer, and climb behind the wheel of a car. Arizona leaves it up to the officers discretion as to wether you are impaired. A BAL of .01 can result in a conviction. I won't risk it. Another aspect that worries me is taxation. Several politicians on the horizon are touting VAT taxes as a way to generate revenue. These are hidden in the cost of goods, and therefore, we would not really know what we are paying. These are sure to be applied to ammo, components, and the evil firearms themselves, effectively pricing them out of reach of most folk that I know. What part of ".....shall not be infringed." do they not get ? In legalise, the word SHALL is one of if not the most powerful word in the language, yet we are getting stomped on hard. After all, if it saves just one life, rite ? " Some rights have a limit" according to Lindsay Graham. And I'm afraid that is a prevailing sentiment in our ruling class. Ruling class ? Wait, did I say that ?.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Texas State State Rep. Briscoe Cain
Top