Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Testing Friction Reduction of Bullet Coatings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Outlaw6.0" data-source="post: 682389" data-attributes="member: 23486"><p>Interesting topic for sure. In your 6.5x284 with 140 A-Max setup, what was the velocity difference utilizing the same load running coated vs uncoated? </p><p> </p><p>There is a TON of information regarding the effects of lubricant on the bullet; how about the effects on the bore? Less friction should, & I say should, promote longevity of the bore life; should it not? 2nd, running a coated bullet, shouldn't copper fouling be reduced to a near zero amount? </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>t</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Outlaw6.0, post: 682389, member: 23486"] Interesting topic for sure. In your 6.5x284 with 140 A-Max setup, what was the velocity difference utilizing the same load running coated vs uncoated? There is a TON of information regarding the effects of lubricant on the bullet; how about the effects on the bore? Less friction should, & I say should, promote longevity of the bore life; should it not? 2nd, running a coated bullet, shouldn't copper fouling be reduced to a near zero amount? t [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Testing Friction Reduction of Bullet Coatings
Top