Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Test results on 264 cal 150 & 160 gr Matrix Bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrentM" data-source="post: 996840" data-attributes="member: 61747"><p>Curios Bryan, I really like the format which spells out stepped BC for given velocity. I have had discussions with some people who claim to be experts and quote you often about stepped BC formats for ballistics apps. They seem to think stepped BC for Bergers is bogus. I have both Matrix and Bergers in the 6.5 I use for my predator rifles and have played with my own trial and error stepped BC for the berger 140. Do you feel this format is the best method for that bullet as well?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrentM, post: 996840, member: 61747"] Curios Bryan, I really like the format which spells out stepped BC for given velocity. I have had discussions with some people who claim to be experts and quote you often about stepped BC formats for ballistics apps. They seem to think stepped BC for Bergers is bogus. I have both Matrix and Bergers in the 6.5 I use for my predator rifles and have played with my own trial and error stepped BC for the berger 140. Do you feel this format is the best method for that bullet as well? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Test results on 264 cal 150 & 160 gr Matrix Bullets
Top