Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Test results on 264 cal 150 & 160 gr Matrix Bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 1095653" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>It is because of the form factor difference in the two which equates to b.c. In short, the Berger has a more aggressive (more pointed) nose than the Matrix which makes it cut the air a little better. My personal opinion though is that the Matrix is a better performer on game and the slight difference in b.c. does not bother me. Also, the Matrix is less sensitive to seating depth than the Berger.....Rich</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 1095653, member: 13833"] It is because of the form factor difference in the two which equates to b.c. In short, the Berger has a more aggressive (more pointed) nose than the Matrix which makes it cut the air a little better. My personal opinion though is that the Matrix is a better performer on game and the slight difference in b.c. does not bother me. Also, the Matrix is less sensitive to seating depth than the Berger.....Rich [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Test results on 264 cal 150 & 160 gr Matrix Bullets
Top