Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Swarovski PH or Zeiss MC conquest rifle scope what one's is better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buano" data-source="post: 457748" data-attributes="member: 21641"><p>Swarovski glass & coatings are generally SLIGHTLY better than Zeiss, but the differences in ability to hunt low-light between these two scopes are apt to be too small to notice.</p><p></p><p>For low-light hunting I would rather have a quality 50mm objective lens with an illuminated reticle than a 56mm objective without an illuminated reticle. I find the first thing that goes in low-light is my ability to see the reticle clearly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buano, post: 457748, member: 21641"] Swarovski glass & coatings are generally SLIGHTLY better than Zeiss, but the differences in ability to hunt low-light between these two scopes are apt to be too small to notice. For low-light hunting I would rather have a quality 50mm objective lens with an illuminated reticle than a 56mm objective without an illuminated reticle. I find the first thing that goes in low-light is my ability to see the reticle clearly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Swarovski PH or Zeiss MC conquest rifle scope what one's is better?
Top