Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Sporter vs Monte Carlo stock
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remington92" data-source="post: 1963308" data-attributes="member: 96256"><p>I most likely will be going with a 40s mm objective. So even through the comb is lower the greater drop at heel does lift the rifle into a higher position making it feel higher than a standard stock? Also just noticed what is the difference in comb and Monte Carlo measurement?</p><p></p><p>Weathermark Monte Carlo </p><p>Monte Carlo 0.625"</p><p>Drop at comb 0.875</p><p>Drop at heel 1.625"</p><p></p><p>Backcountry </p><p>Drop at comb 0.625"</p><p>drop at heel 0.325"</p><p></p><p>Sorry if these are stupid questions</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remington92, post: 1963308, member: 96256"] I most likely will be going with a 40s mm objective. So even through the comb is lower the greater drop at heel does lift the rifle into a higher position making it feel higher than a standard stock? Also just noticed what is the difference in comb and Monte Carlo measurement? Weathermark Monte Carlo Monte Carlo 0.625” Drop at comb 0.875 Drop at heel 1.625” Backcountry Drop at comb 0.625” drop at heel 0.325” Sorry if these are stupid questions [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Sporter vs Monte Carlo stock
Top