Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
So I’m not the only one... 264 Win Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrison" data-source="post: 1476211" data-attributes="member: 12911"><p>There are so many .264 cartridges out there, I love the reference to new and shiny. The .264 WM is outstanding, but I am amazed at how the 6.5 Swedish is ignored. With new modern receivers and barrels this cartridge from 1896 can compete and in some cases is superior to these new shiny .264's. I discovered this cartridge after I built my first 7 X 57 for deer and fell in love. I now have 2 of the 6.5 Swedish rifles and according to the ballistic books it out performs the 6.5 Creedmoor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrison, post: 1476211, member: 12911"] There are so many .264 cartridges out there, I love the reference to new and shiny. The .264 WM is outstanding, but I am amazed at how the 6.5 Swedish is ignored. With new modern receivers and barrels this cartridge from 1896 can compete and in some cases is superior to these new shiny .264's. I discovered this cartridge after I built my first 7 X 57 for deer and fell in love. I now have 2 of the 6.5 Swedish rifles and according to the ballistic books it out performs the 6.5 Creedmoor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
So I’m not the only one... 264 Win Mag
Top