Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
SMK vs. AccuBond
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="davewilson" data-source="post: 103155" data-attributes="member: 4491"><p>my reasoning was at 900 yards you need something that,as GG said, hits where you want.it also has to fragment or expand a bunch,as long as it makes it through surface bones before it comes apart.i also agree with a previous post that the 30-33 caliber MK's work better for long range than the smaller calibers.my point was, for long range, i'll take the bullet that fragments on a dirt bank at 900 over one that mushrooms nicely at 300.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="davewilson, post: 103155, member: 4491"] my reasoning was at 900 yards you need something that,as GG said, hits where you want.it also has to fragment or expand a bunch,as long as it makes it through surface bones before it comes apart.i also agree with a previous post that the 30-33 caliber MK's work better for long range than the smaller calibers.my point was, for long range, i'll take the bullet that fragments on a dirt bank at 900 over one that mushrooms nicely at 300. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
SMK vs. AccuBond
Top