Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Smaller blood trail with Hammer bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zen Archery" data-source="post: 2333915" data-attributes="member: 60545"><p>As an archer you learn, shot placement determines blood trail. I ran the most lethal broadhead at the time 2.5" cutting diameter. Landed high on the hog tracked it for hours until I gave up. Same broadhead, same size hog snapped it's spine. </p><p></p><p>Entry wound + tissue damage with the hammers won't do you wrong. I just shot a coyote with the lightest .264 hammer bullet that literally blew its internal organs out so that wouldn't be a fair comparison.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zen Archery, post: 2333915, member: 60545"] As an archer you learn, shot placement determines blood trail. I ran the most lethal broadhead at the time 2.5” cutting diameter. Landed high on the hog tracked it for hours until I gave up. Same broadhead, same size hog snapped it’s spine. Entry wound + tissue damage with the hammers won’t do you wrong. I just shot a coyote with the lightest .264 hammer bullet that literally blew its internal organs out so that wouldn’t be a fair comparison. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Smaller blood trail with Hammer bullets?
Top