Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
sig sauer kilo 2000 rangefinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="royinidaho" data-source="post: 1138320" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Spent a little more time with the Kilo 2000 and Leica 1600 B this morning.</p><p></p><p>Nothing highly technical some comparisons from the tripod and some from the truck window.</p><p></p><p>The long and short of it is that up to the effective distance of the Leica 1600 B any thing that the 1600 B will range the Kilo 2000 will range.</p><p></p><p>One instance where the Kilo out did the Leica was a 500 pound or so heifer in a swale where only the upper half of her body was visible the in the scan mode the Kilo nailed it while the Leica wouldn't. I'm thinking that if the Leica had a faster scan rate it may have got the job done.</p><p></p><p>Another instance where the Kilo out did the Leica was a 672 yard heifer facing away.</p><p></p><p>I'm beginning to really like the range reading when the button is pushed and the verification reading when it is released. When both readings are the same you know you nailed it.</p><p></p><p>Bare trees from 900 to 1100 yards were a piece of cake for both units.</p><p></p><p>While waving the Kilo around, low and behold, I ranged a white house at 2454.7 yards. The house must have been nearly perpendicular to me as from one side to the other the range changed only 0.50 yards.</p><p></p><p>That seems pretty nifty and is what I am looking for when setting ELR targets. I will drive to the target spot, place a large reflective object then go to the farthest visible spot and take the shot. All I want to know is the distance. It need not be any specific distance but needs to be a known distance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="royinidaho, post: 1138320, member: 2011"] Spent a little more time with the Kilo 2000 and Leica 1600 B this morning. Nothing highly technical some comparisons from the tripod and some from the truck window. The long and short of it is that up to the effective distance of the Leica 1600 B any thing that the 1600 B will range the Kilo 2000 will range. One instance where the Kilo out did the Leica was a 500 pound or so heifer in a swale where only the upper half of her body was visible the in the scan mode the Kilo nailed it while the Leica wouldn't. I'm thinking that if the Leica had a faster scan rate it may have got the job done. Another instance where the Kilo out did the Leica was a 672 yard heifer facing away. I'm beginning to really like the range reading when the button is pushed and the verification reading when it is released. When both readings are the same you know you nailed it. Bare trees from 900 to 1100 yards were a piece of cake for both units. While waving the Kilo around, low and behold, I ranged a white house at 2454.7 yards. The house must have been nearly perpendicular to me as from one side to the other the range changed only 0.50 yards. That seems pretty nifty and is what I am looking for when setting ELR targets. I will drive to the target spot, place a large reflective object then go to the farthest visible spot and take the shot. All I want to know is the distance. It need not be any specific distance but needs to be a known distance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
sig sauer kilo 2000 rangefinder
Top