Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Short barreled 257 Wby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2637879" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>No argument about the practicality of a 25-284 but this comparison between the 25-06 and the 257 bee is skewed I think. </p><p></p><p>You'd have to be pretty selective in what data and ammo you'd look at to make a case that a 25-06 is only 100-150 fps slower and out of 2 inches less barrel. That's a 25-06 loaded to</p><p>The gills and a "lawyered up" .257 weatherby:</p><p></p><p>Nosler load data for weatherby cArtridges is especially ridiculous in how underpowered they make them look: probably the only way they can claim that the .30 Nosler OUTPERFORMS the .300 weatherby with a straight face <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /> </p><p></p><p>They don't water down cartridges like the 270 win, 25-06 rem, or even my .300 win mag too bad….it's caused me to ask </p><p></p><p>"what's in it for them to hamstring all the weatherby cartridges they have data for?"</p><p></p><p>I have a theory….<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2637879, member: 109862"] No argument about the practicality of a 25-284 but this comparison between the 25-06 and the 257 bee is skewed I think. You’d have to be pretty selective in what data and ammo you’d look at to make a case that a 25-06 is only 100-150 fps slower and out of 2 inches less barrel. That’s a 25-06 loaded to The gills and a “lawyered up” .257 weatherby: Nosler load data for weatherby cArtridges is especially ridiculous in how underpowered they make them look: probably the only way they can claim that the .30 Nosler OUTPERFORMS the .300 weatherby with a straight face 🤣 They don’t water down cartridges like the 270 win, 25-06 rem, or even my .300 win mag too bad….it’s caused me to ask “what’s in it for them to hamstring all the weatherby cartridges they have data for?” I have a theory….🤣🤣🤣 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Short barreled 257 Wby
Top